Hi SuzieH ,
Thanks for the answer. There are few missing information and typos in the document that makes me question the integrity of the data I'm pulling via API.
For an example, I think "Viewing Accepted Solutions Metrics" have the (Node) and (User) notation switched. This is based on the metric values I was getting back, as well as metric names under the description.
Another issue I ran into was with net_comments_per_idea. The description says that the value is calculated by dividing Net Ideas Comments (net_idea_comments) by Net Ideas (net_idea_threads), but the value seems way off. Here is an example:
My api call for Net Ideas Comments is .../restapi/vc/metrics/name/net_idea_comments/history/daily?date_start=2014-06-12T00:00:00&date_end=2014-06-12T23:59:59&xslt=json.xsl&restapi.session_key=...
This returns a two digit value.
My api call for Net Ideas is .../restapi/vc/metrics/name/net_idea_threads/history/daily?date_start=2014-06-12T00:00:00&date_end=2014-06-12T23:59:59&xslt=json.xsl&restapi.session_key=...
This also returns a two digit value.
When I finally call for Net Comments per Idea using
.../restapi/vc/metrics/name/net_comments_per_idea/history/daily?date_start=2014-06-12T00:00:00&date_end=2014-06-12T23:59:59&xslt=json.xsl&restapi.session_key=...
I get a three digit (sometimes four digit) number.
I'm just having trouble trusting some of these data due to problems like these. Could you provide an insight?
Thanks so much in advance!