tyw
Boss
Joined 12 years ago
User Profile
User Widgets
Contributions
- 157ViewsSign in to react to this post0Comments
Guidance on Removing URL Fragments in Khoros Community Classic
Hello everyone, Google recently provided feedback indicating that using fragments in URLs is not considered a best practice. As a result, I've been asked if we can eliminate fragments on the server side. For example, consider the following URL: https://community.khoros.com/t5/Khoros-Communities-Aurora/Analytics-Support-for-3rd-party-tools-eg-Google-Analytics-Custom/m-p/763108#M246 While Aurora does not use fragments, which is great, I am curious about potential mitigation strategies for those still using Classic. As far as I understand, and I admit I'm not a developer, the only way to address this issue is on the client side via the Page Initialization Script. Is there a possibility to handle this on the server side, perhaps through Khoros Professional Services? Additionally, I have concerns about the impact of removing fragments. If we were to implement a solution, would it prevent users from linking to specific replies? While this may improve SEO, it could also affect core functionality. Any thoughts/feedback is welcome as I'm a bit stumped hereViewsSign in to react to this postCommentsRe: Aurora Upgrade Playbook
When does Khoros expect Localization support to be completed, or in preview/beta? This is blocking us and it seems to be slipping/pushed back based on previously shared dates a few times? I'm assuming Localization includes Top Level Categories but if not, that feature in particular is our blocker so I'd love to get an update on where this is in the development pipelineViewsSign in to react to this postComments- ViewsSign in to react to this postComments
Re: Khoros Communities 24.2 Release
Update: I've been able to fix the issue but suspect there's a underlying issue. luk , re Hide, thank you! I can confirm this has always been unchecked and during troubleshooting while on 24.2 I did toggle this at the EN root category level - no change occurred. EN was still missing. For a test now, after rolling back I toggled that Hide option on the new category and board I added and verify the node count query updated to reflect the change (counting when shown, dropping by 1 if hidden). It shows 140 with the new items I added, set to appear. I then toggled the EN root category options hide option, saving as checked,, then unchecked and boom - LIQL now shows 220 items which is the missing EN category and content. Yay! My issue is solved, but why did this occur when that Hide option has not been used in years in Stage? CarolineS , I'd love to know if you see similar results? Toggling hide on, and off after rolling back?ViewsSign in to react to this postCommentsRe: Khoros Communities 24.2 Release
Update: We rolled back but the LIQL issue persists and whats odd is i can add, and edit new items to the EN category, and have them appear in LIQL, but the other items, that have existed since we went live years ago no longer appear, specific to our EN category only? CarolineS , if you roll back, does LIQL still show a issue? The Q I'm trying to solve now, is there any setting that can prevent something from appearing in LIQL? As far as I know nothing like that exists? LIQL should return everything based on access of the person requesting and im using admin?ViewsSign in to react to this postCommentsRe: Khoros Communities 24.2 Release
24.2 is the first release in a while to break my site so I'm going to ask for a rollback so I can compare something odd I noticed. Stage on 24.2, this query shows 133 results https://community.DOMAIN.com/api/2.0/search?q=SELECT * from nodes limit 500 Production on 23.12, this query shoe 178 results https://community.DOMAIN.com/api/2.0/search?q=SELECT * from nodes limit 500 I can't seem to identify why this is occurring beyond stage was upgraded was working fine yesterday so I'll reach out to support.ViewsSign in to react to this postCommentsRe: Great SEO Builds Community, and Great Community Improves SEO
Hoekstra_VFZ , how did you make out with your case since this is the next thing I'm hoping to resolve on my site based on feedback from our SEO team. In particular the acceptedAnswer URL which is a optional field but valuable to include.ViewsSign in to react to this postCommentsRe: Getting a copy of API documentation
+1 to dev documentation being offered up for customer consumptionViewsSign in to react to this postComments- ViewsSign in to react to this postComments
157Views
0Comments